hair-loss

Rebuild Hair Program Review – Is Jared Gates’ Method Really Effective?

This Rebuild Hair Program review was written for the purpose of taking an in-depth look at Jared Gates new hair loss protocol. The Rebuild Hair Program is a natural, scientifically tested treatment which reverses hair loss and makes it grow back by inhibiting the production 5AR and DHT. It’s a very solid option for those who have been having trouble with hair loss, and works for male and female readers.

The Rebuild Hair Program comes in PDF format, as a digital ebook, and it is available for purchase in Jared Gates’ official website. After buying it, the reader can instantly download the file from the author’s website, and read it through any PDF reader.

The Dilemma of Hair Loss

Like some other parts of the body which may suddenly become problematic, hair is something the majority of people take for granted – and only start caring about when it starts disappearing. Hair loss is really worrisome for men and women across the globe ñ and the topic is a quickly growing concern for more and more people as time goes buy.

The purpose of hair, of course, is to protect the scalp from the sun and help regulate body temperature, since it holds body heat. However, another really important function it has is aesthetics ñ and it’s the one people usually value a lot. Hair is often associated with health and beauty, and can be styled in very different ways, allowing for people to express themselves and become distinguished from the others.

When going through hair loss, many people deal with complicated emotional and self-image issues, and even though medical and scientific advancements can help, they can be really expensive and come with major side effects and the majority of them is really ineffective in truly reversing hair loss. That’s why I suggest a natural Rebuild hair program for male pattern baldness.

According to Jared Gates, the book’s author, the Rebuild Hair Program offers an entirely natural protocol for preventing and reversing hair loss, which is perfectly effective, safe and inexpensive ñ and also proved scientifically to promote hair regrowth.



The-rule-of-thumb-is-that-you-should-wait-six-months-before-seeking-a-doctor’s-advice-if-you-are-over-35

What You Should Know About Obesity

It seems that no matter where you turn, you are hearing about obesity. This includes hearing about the statistics, dangers and how it can affect many areas of one’s life. Everybody knows that weight gain is bad, but being surrounded by super-sized meals and communities that are not really designed for walking, leads to some people wondering if there is anyways they can beat the battle of the bulge? The answer is yes, they can, but there are some things they will want to know.

1. What Is Obesity- Obesity rates have been on the rise over the last 25 years. In matter of fact, a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey revealed that 33 percent of men are obese, while 35 percent of women are obese. As for children and adolescents, 16 percent of them were obese.

With the above said, you might be wondering what is obesity? In easy to understand terms, obesity is when a person is carrying enough body fat to put them at risk for various ailments, which includes stroke, hypertension, diabetes, cancer, reproductive disorders and more. Obesity can affect a person’s health in a big way.

In order to determine whether a person has obesity, a person would need to figure out what their body mass index is. This is done via a formula that includes the person’s height and weight. If an adult has a number of 25 or more, then they fall in the overweight category, and if the value is 30 or more, then they are considered obese.

However, the above formula is not appropriate for teens and children, and this is because the amount of body fat changes with age, as well as with growth and between boys and girls. This is why the formula is age and gender specific. A person can use a BMI calculator, which can help them figure out what their body mass index is.

2. What Causes It- There are a number of things that causes obesity, with one of them being that junk food is easily accessible and not that expensive. The calories people consume today is more than the calories people were consuming 50+ years ago. Let’s not forget to mention that technology makes people’s lives easier.

Instead if walking everywhere, people are driving, and instead of going to a colleague’s desk, people e-mail them. Even the environment can play a role in weight gain, as some people have genes that make them susceptible to weight gain in certain environmental conditions.

3. The Effects- Everybody knows that obesity can cause a lot of problems for people and put them at risk for many health issues, but it can even do more than that. In matter of fact, obesity can cause economic hardships, which is something that you may not be aware of. Not only that, but obesity can cause psychological effects. Some of the psychological effects include depression and self-esteem issues.

Those who are obese may even suffer from discrimination. In matter of fact, it is said by many that discrimination towards large people exceeds race and gender discrimination. As you can see, obesity can affect people in quite a few different ways.

As you can see from the above, obesity can be affected by both the environment and by a person’s genes, but the good news is that you can do things fight obesity and to lose weight. You should stay active by doing things such as exercising and eating right. Spend less time doing things such as watching TV, as sedentary activities can contribute to obesity. Fighting obesity may not be easy for many people, but the key is to stay active, eat right and be consistent, as well as patient and eventually they could end up winning their battle with obesity.



How-Cut-Calories

Weight Loss from Cutting Calories Less than Expected

Many people have a tendency to exaggerate things when it comes to weight loss. On is on how reducing your caloric intake will make you lose weight. This leads to unrealistic expectations and disappointment according to some researchers.

There are many patients that are being told they will cut a pound every week if reduce the number of calories they take by 500 daily. This is somehow unrealistic and seem quite impossible. To achieve such results, one would have to do measure that will serious consequences. A more realistic formula according to Kevin D. Hall is losing about 50 pounds within a period of three years or more. Dr. Hall is from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in Bethesda.

There was a special issue dedicated to obesity in the Aug 27 issue of The Lancet where they gave an explanation. They said only such weight loss could be achieved if a person maintained the same caloric reduction over a long period of time.

There are some standard rules that have been endorsed by the American Dietetic Association and the National Institute of Health, among other that have failed to consider the human metabolism responds in a dynamic way when there are changes in body composition and diet, Hall and his colleagues asserted.

If for example a person weighing 300 pound decides to diet, it means after six years of losing 50 pounds yearly, the person would vanish because he wouldnít have any weight.

This ubiquitous weight rule was derived by estimating the energy content of weight lost. This rule is also known as the 3,500 (calorie) per pound rule. The rule ignores the physiological adaptations that will alter the body weight. This will lead to the reduction of the resting metabolic rate of the body and the energy needed to carry out physical activities ì the researchers noted.

In cases where a person has gained weight, their baseline energy needs will most likely increase. This is in an effort to keep the new tissues alive and enable them to move around. This is also the case when weight is lost, the body will decrease the baseline energy needs.

The more people cut down on their caloric intake, they go below the baseline energy requirement while will in turn trigger weight loss. As one continues to lose weight, the baseline energy needs will start to decrease until it reaches a point where it equal to the intake. This will stop the weight loss process. This means the amount of weight lost will decrease with time.

Hall and his colleagues then came up with what they said was a better model of caloric intake and the resultant weight loss. It included a feedback mechanism that reflected the changes in metabolism over time in response to body weight and diet.

When there is 100 kilojoule or 24 calories reduction per day in intake, it will lead to 1 kg or 2.2lbs of weight loss, the researchers found out. It also showed that only half of the loss will occur in the first year of cutting back the calories. 95% of the ultimate weight loss will be realized in the next three years.

Using data that had been collected in previous research, Hall and his colleagues said they found out that the U.S population had an excess energy intake of about 30 kilojoules each day. This is the main reason behind the increased cases of obesity and overweight people.

If the population wants to return to the body mass index of the 1970s, they would need to shrink their average diet by about 220 calories daily.

The metabolic requirements needed to sustain the mass of the body vary from person to person. The researchers used the average figures for the American adult population. This means some will need to cut back on their caloric intake more than others to realize the same goal.
Consequently, Hall and his colleagues wrote that the results of a given diet are seen in the energy deficits.

The researchers argued that these results they found had an important implication when it comes to policy.

To prove this, we can refer to a policy paper that from the Department of Agriculture that showed that an estimated 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks would lead to an average of 40 calories intake by the American people daily.

Going by the standard 3,500 calorie per pound rule, the paper showed that the expected weight loss could be about 1.84kg (4 lbs.) each year. This was contended by Hall and his colleagues who termed it as incorrect.

Going by their research, they said it would take about five years to achieve that level of average weight loss.
We are suggesting that the unrealistic expectations of weight loss that is obtained by using the erroneous dieting rule should be removed and replaced using our methods to determine the necessary obesity prevention interventions,î the researchers noted. They also that their model is important in evaluating interventions because it takes account of physical activity and the effect on metabolism and body weight.

The main problem is that adhering is very difficult. Moreover, the changes can be compounded into long term targets. One manifestation is that a person will lose weight while in the program and will continue to do so even after going back to their old lifestyle. This will in turn encourage weight gain again.